Mario Splivalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wo-ha, makes perfect sense. So, I'd go by with declaring the rec as
> varchar, instead as of a record. Wich is what I should do in the first
> place.

Or just return the correct field out of it.

        RETURN NEXT returnValue.fieldname;

I think you may have to do it this way because the FOR loop wants a
record variable.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to