Mario Splivalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Wo-ha, makes perfect sense. So, I'd go by with declaring the rec as > varchar, instead as of a record. Wich is what I should do in the first > place.
Or just return the correct field out of it.
RETURN NEXT returnValue.fieldname;
I think you may have to do it this way because the FOR loop wants a
record variable.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
