On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:13:43PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Am I missing something? Is there a reason not to simply cast the > > timestamp value to time? > > I think the OP was trying to use the functional cast syntax > time(now()) > which worked long ago, but has not since we added the > SQL-spec time precision syntax.
I was referring to the expression that Rod Taylor posted, wondering if there was some subtlety I was missing or if Rod simply didn't think of the simpler solution (Rod responded indicating the latter). -- Michael Fuhr ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
