A question about encoding, some days ago, led me to concentrate my attention
on the subject and perform a few tests on two different 8.1 installations,
configured as follows:
Machine 1 - pt_PT(Portuguese_Portugal.28591)/LATIN1
Machine 2 - pt_PT(Portuguese_Portugal.28605)/LATIN9
In both machines, case insensitive pattern matching designed to match the
letter 'A' will indeed match 'A' and 'a' but not the accented forms.
Generalizing, an accented or unaccented vowel in the pattern will only match
that vowel in upper or lowercase forms if the accent is the same as
specified in the pattern.
For instance, if the pattern specifies an uppercase 'A' with an accute
accent, then it will match a lowercase 'A' with an accute accent, but not an
upper or lower case 'A' with a tilde.
This behaviour seems inconsistent with that of the ORDER BY clause, which
considers all forms of a vowel as equal (uppercase/lowercase,accented/not
accented).
Shouldn't case insensitive pattern matching follow the same collation
weights that ORDER BY uses ?
Can someone please elaborate on this subject ?
Another question, for european users:
Until now, I've been selecting LATIN1 encoding, but after a few tests, I
came to think that LATIN9 is a better option (the euro sign...).
For those who regularly use LATIN9, what is your opinion ? Is it indeed a
better option ?
Thank you.
Hélder M. Vieira
LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH GRAVE
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
