Tom Lane wrote:
> Bryce Nesbitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> What does EXPLAIN show for this and for the base query?
>>>
>
>
>> -> Seq Scan on event (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=408)
>> Filter: (reconciled = false)
>>
>
>
>> select count(*) from event;
>> -----------
>> 116226
>>
>
> It seems pretty clear that you've never vacuumed nor analyzed these
> tables ... else the planner would have some clue about their sizes.
> Do that and then see what you get.
>
They occur in fine time. That's good, thanks. But jeeze, can't
postgres figure this out for itself?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
