On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 11:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mario Splivalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Am I doing something wrong here, or there is no way of using temporary
> > tables within 'sql' written functions?
>
> I believe the problem is that for a SQL function we parse the whole
> function body before executing any of it. So you'd need to split this
> into two separate functions.
Having two function complicates, a bit, interface between applicaation
and the database. But, then again, If I split it in two functions, then
one with the UPDATE still can't find temp table referenced in other
function, right?
I have no problem writing func1() example in plpgsql, it just seemed to
me that using sql instead of plpgsql (when I actually can use sql) gives
me a little performance improvement.
Mike
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
