Hi Peter,

:)

All my Pg code is written via (or handed to) an abstraction layer, and I actually write no functions or stored procedures at all. I write using Rails, so in this case it's a Ruby library called ActiveRecord which has a Postgres module that allows me to talk via "ActiveRecord-speak" or via direct Postgres sql commands. (For example, AR has no idea how to create a GiST index, so I issue that DDL statement manually using the special syntax - also AR is not always so smart about SQL queries so tricky ones I write by hand).

Maybe I misunderstand Q3C completely but it looks like C code that has to be installed into the Postgres server itself - not a series of SQL functions that can implemented on an unmodified server. I think my ISP is fine with anything that gets installed via user-level privileges. Anything that requires root and/or anything that involves binary code they are more cautious about.

To be fair, I'm cautious about the same things, but given Oleg's reputation and contributions to Pg, I wouldn't be so concerned about Q3C specifically.

Am I ignorant of something fundamental in this conversation? I really do appreciate any education or insight here. Are C code "patches" or functions more of a risk to server stability/reliability than higher level code? Or am I speaking gibberish?

Thanks,

Steve





At 01:01 AM 3/6/2007, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Steve Midgley wrote:
> my ISP that manages my Pg SQL server is (in my interests)
> concerned about installing anything non-standard (read: unstable)
> onto their server. I was able to get them to install your TSearch2
> b/c it's been proven many times, but I'm hesitant to even bring up
> Q3C since it's less widely deployed.

How do you manage to get your own code installed under that theory?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to