Thanks a lot for your suggestions. I have ony single master. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Huxton Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:13 PM To: Chris Browne Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [SQL] Database Synchronization
Chris Browne wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Huxton) writes: >> >> http://www.slony.info/ > But it is worth noting one thing about the synchronization... > > Slony-I's strategy is pretty simple: One node is considered the > "master," and the other node is forcibly made to conform to what is on > the master. > > If you want to synchronize back and forth (e.g. - multimaster > replication of some sort), Slony-I is not suitable... Except in the case when you can have separate tables for the data. If you have a london_sales table only updated in London and a paris_sales table only updated in Paris then you have something inching towards multi-master. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
