On 1/9/08, Erik Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > On Jan 9, 2008 12:20 PM, Steve Midgley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This is kludgy but you would have some kind of random number test at
> >> the start of the trigger - if it evals true once per every ten
> >> calls to
> >> the trigger (say), you'd cut your delete statements execs by about
> >> 10x
> >> and still periodically truncate every set of user rows fairly
> >> often.
> >
> > And, if you always through a limit 50 on the end of queries that
> > retrieve data, you could let it grow quite a bit more than 60 or 70...
> > Say 200. Then you could have it so that the random chopper function
> > only gets kicked off every 100th or so time.
>
> I like that idea.
I do too! I'm going to have a shot at implementing this tomorrow.
Thanks for all your opinions guys :-)
Cheers,
Jamie
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
