|
(because our legacy application, which won't change, is using the
underlying tables. We can't do step #5). Bryce Nesbitt wrote: Yes, the view approach has some advantages. But it still leaves the underlying tables naked to modification. And since the most likely error is... well... me (or another admin) at the SQL prompt, we want underlying tables protected also.chester c young wrote: -- ---- Visit http://www.obviously.com/ |
- [SQL] Proposed archival read only trigger on rows - preven... Bryce Nesbitt
- Re: [SQL] Proposed archival read only trigger on rows... chester c young
- Re: [SQL] Proposed archival read only trigger on ... Bryce Nesbitt
- Re: [SQL] Proposed archival read only trigger... Bryce Nesbitt
- Re: [SQL] Proposed archival read only trigger... Robert Treat
- Re: [SQL] Proposed archival read only tri... Phillip Smith
