"Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Again, you are not understanding my point.  My point was that specifying 
> tablename.columnname%TYPE notation doesn't help with the performance 
> problem;  I have to explicitly cast the parameter in the body of the 
> function.

The reason for the lack of communication is that no one else believes
that premise.  Casting a value to the same type it already has is
demonstrably a no-op.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

                http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Reply via email to