On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Kaare Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't this exactly what Alvaro describes? The time travel feature that was > removed because it made Postgres too slow to use in production?
No, I imagine that time travel was built into the Postgresql architecture and would work automatically with transaction ids and tuple ids. On the other hand, temporal tables/schemes are implemented by the data modeller. Also the associated temporal operations on the data would be handled by client DML designed to simulate temporal data operations. -- Regards, Richard Broersma Jr. Visit the Los Angles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG) http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug -- Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
