On Mon, 25 May 2009 15:20:57 +0100 "Oliveiros Cristina" <oliveiros.crist...@marktest.pt> wrote:
> Thank you for pointing it out, Ivan. > The query I am trying to restrict output for happens to be an > ORDER BY query. > Actually I wasn't aware of this detail. > I'll leave a mental note for myself that results might be > unexpected for not ORDER BY queries a bit more about "unexpected": - if people insert other rows... and by chance they happen to fall before the ones you already retrieved... no matter of the ORDER BY, you may "miss" them in the "paginated result". - without an order by there is no "granted" order. This is not a deficiency of PostgreSQL, it is not mandated by sql standard and it offers chances for optimisation The fact that without an order by clause they may return in the same order... is implementation dependent and Postgresql don't behave that way or it happens just by chance. -- Ivan Sergio Borgonovo http://www.webthatworks.it -- Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
