On Saturday 10 October 2009 3:16 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Paulsen <rob...@paulsenonline.net> writes:
> > On Saturday 10 October 2009 2:00 pm, Robert Paulsen wrote:
> >> So no default for id. What should it be?
> >> default nextval('vault_id_seq')
> >
> > Should have tried that before posting last message -- it worked. Thanks!
>
> So the next question is just what happened and whether you're missing
> anything else from the original database state ...
>
> regards, tom lane
Well, there was one other table with a sequence as a primary key and that was
lost also. Otherwise nothing else was wrong. I went through a dump/restore
cycle after fixing things and it all worked.
I do have a question, though, I fixed things as indicated above:
id integer DEFAULT nextval('vault_id_seq') NOT NULL,
Dump gave back
id integer DEFAULT nextval('vault_id_seq'::text) NOT NULL,
That "text" seems odd. Should I change it?
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
