Thanks, Joe and Tom. You cleared the webs out of my brain. I used
HAVING before, but not lately and I got rusty.
Mark
Tom Lane wrote:
Mark Fenbers <mark.fenb...@noaa.gov> writes:
I want to do:
SELECT id, count(*) FROM mytable WHERE count(*) > 2 GROUP BY id;
But this doesn't work because Pg won't allow aggregate functions in a
where clause.
Use HAVING, not WHERE. The way you are trying to write the query is
meaningless because WHERE filters rows before grouping/aggregation.
HAVING filters afterwards, which is when it makes sense to put a
condition on count(*).
regards, tom lane
|
<<attachment: Mark_Fenbers.vcf>>
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
