El 22/10/11 14:53, David Johnston escribió:
> On Oct 22, 2011, at 6:41, Linos <i...@linos.es> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> i need a little of advice on what could be the best way to store this
>> information.
>>
>> We need to calculate the difference in costs for our operations, we are
>> already
>> storing our vendor invoices in the database so calculate the monetary change
>> it
>> is a no-brainer but we need to store special attributes for any of the
>> invoices
>> that we need to compare too, for example:
>> -electric provider: total Kw.
>> -water provider: total m3.
>> -car maintenance: kilometers of the car.
>> -mobile phones provider: international call minutes, national minutes,
>> number
>> of sms, etc..
>>
>> And much more types/variables, the number of variables can change, not every
>> day
>> but still can change, i would like that they can be defined/changed from our
>> application, so alter table to add columns don't seem the best way (still an
>> option though). We will have "generic" reports that will show us changes in
>> costs and specific reports for the types with "extended attributes" that we
>> want
>> to compare.
>>
>> To compare values from this "extended attributes" i think we have two ways:
>> 1- have them in columns and use standard SQL.
>> 2- create the columns with a function that reads this attrs and create
>> the columns.
>>
>> So far i thin we have this options:
>> 1- a bunch of columns that would be null except when the type of the
>> invoice
>> uses them.
>> 2- a table related with the vendor invoices table for every type of
>> invoice
>> with his specifics columns.
>> 3- a key/value in a separate table related with the vendor invoices table
>> where
>> i store the extended attrs of every invoice that needs them.
>> 4- use a hstore column in the vendor invoces table to store this attrs.
>>
>> The first two have the problem of probably changes to the number of
>> attributes
>> of every type and give a more closed solution, apart from that 1- seems to
>> be a
>> bit awkward and 2- would need the application that creates the query to know
>> with what table should join for every type (other point we will need to
>> change
>> if we want to create new invoices types).
>>
>> The last two have his own problems too, with 3 i will need to create a
>> function
>> that return rows as columns to compare them, with 4- given that i will store
>> the
>> attrs of every type in the database anyway i can use the operator -> (with a
>> CASE using operator ? returning 0 if the searched attr it is not in the
>> hstore)
>> but still don't seem a clean solution for me.
>>
>> For me it seems i am missing something, probably any of you have a much more
>> elegant (or correct) way to handle this situation, what would be your advice?
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>
> Create a table with a single numeric column and multiple category columns.
>
> ( amount_value, amount_unit, amount_category, vendor_id )
>
> If necessary each "amount_value" data type should have it's own table since
> the processing logic will vary (I.e., you cannot subtract text or Boolean
> values).
>
> You are , in effect, creating multiple tables but combining them into one and
> using the category column to distinguish between them.
>
> David J.
Yeah, thanks for the advice David, if i understand you. this is (much better
explained) my option 3, i have used this format any times for configuration
tables with great success.
I am not speaking about much data, maybe 200~300 invoices every month so this
should not be a problem in a long long time, the problem i see with this way of
doing things it is how should i in the report queries get this values as columns
to compare change in time? something like this?
SELECT inv.invoice_id,
inv.total,
(SELECT amount_value
FROM vendor_invoices_attrs
WHERE invoice_id = inv.invoice_id
AND amount_category = 'international call minutes'),
(SELECT amount_value
FROM vendor_invoices_attrs
WHERE invoice_id = inv.invoice_id
AND amount_category = 'national call minutes')
FROM vendor_invoices AS inv
With hstore i think that could be:
SELECT inv.invoice_id,
inv.total,
inv.store -> 'international call minutes',
inv.store -> 'national call minutes'
FROM vendor_invoices
For me the last option seems preferable but maybe i am missing a better way to
get the first result or an added problem of hstore (other than datatypes stored
that i think i could check for validity in application or database regardless of
not been integrated in hstore).
Regards,
Miguel Angel.
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
