Hi Martin,

Peter, please see this as a "power" and not as a shortcoming. Also see, how happy many people still are with character mode applications. This power does not come from the restriction to characters, it comes from the the way how simple and clear they are to use.
It wasn't at all my intention to judge the existing window management philosophy of PicoGUI. Look, I have developed a nice little mainboard for a very small 68k computer scene without the ambition to make any profit. There is one variant of the native OS, which is under a weird proprietary license, and one which is free software. The proprietary OS is the only one which supports the highcolor graphics chipset I designed for my mainboard, but I would like the free native OS to also have a nice GUI.

In fact I like the architecture of PicoGUI, and it seems portable to my machine. But I definitely need a sort of window management, that people are somewhat used to. With the existing PicoGUI window management I don't even need to attempt to find developers in my small scene (there are very few anyway), the race would certainly be lost before I start it. I do of course not expect window management additions for PicoGUI be made to help targets as exotic as mine. I just tried to kindly ask a few questions :-) Many thanks to all who gave their comments.

Peter




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Pgui-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pgui-devel


Reply via email to