2013/5/22 Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> > On 22 May 2013 10:38, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would use > > > > TextModelCore > > TextModelExtensions > > > > TextModelCore-Tests > > > > No extra dash in the middle. > > nooooo :) > > But for tests, i +1, the names are not very good. > For package: > > Package-Name-Tick-Tack > > tests should be in: > > Package-Name-Tick-Tack-Tests >
How it works? Monticello include all subcategories of package. And with this example tests will be part of package Package-Name-Tick-Tack. I test similar example at Pharo 2.0 > > This convention used everywhere in pharo. > > > Stef > > > > On May 21, 2013, at 10:24 PM, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > 2013/5/21 stephane ducasse <[email protected]> > >> > >> > >> On May 21, 2013, at 9:00 AM, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> 2013/5/20 stephane ducasse <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> > >>> Hello. > >>> > >>> New TxText version 0.8 is ready: > >>> > >>> - editor stuff extracted to separate packages TxText-Editor and > >>> TxTextTests-Editor > >>> > >>> may be you should call the second package TxTextEditor-Tests > >> > >> > >> I just follow convention of other TxText packages: TxText-Model -> > >> TxTextTests-Model, TxText-Layout -> TxTextTests-Layout and etc. > >> Some times ago I suggest such repackaging and nobody was against it > >> > >> > >> Still I think that the packages names are not good. I do not hitnk that > >> having tests mixed with the package name is a good approach > >> and we should clean all of them for 3.0 > > > > > > So what the correct way (Pharo way) to name test packages? > > For example I have 'MyPackage-SubCat1-SubCat2'. What name for test > package > > should be? > > > >> > >> > >> Stef > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. > >
