yes, but rizel will give us a good comparison between different versions of our 
own systems, but now agains others (because rizel=interpreter=old and slow) :)
not that it is bad, but I would prefer a dedicated machine. 

said so... I think if we have the benchmarks, I think we can annoy Stef enough 
to get a dedicated benchmark machine... not a terrible new one, but good enough 
:)
but we need to have the benchmarks first, otherwise is loosing time, he. 

Esteban


On May 25, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On 2013-05-25, at 13:46, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 25 May 2013 13:20, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 2013-05-25, at 13:14, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On May 25, 2013, at 1:05 PM, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> A couple of them are in Smark
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~StefanMarr/SMark
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2013-05-25, at 12:55, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> I wonder if there are benchmarks around.
>>>>>> Also I wonder if there would be useful :)
>>>>>> For "marketing" purposes I think yes: if we can put in the web page that 
>>>>>> we are running those benchmarks, it is cool for "seriousness" (that, of 
>>>>>> course, assuming the results will not be terribly bad :P)
>>>>> 
>>>>> I know I am a major pain in the ass, but where do you plan to run these 
>>>>> tests?
>>>> 
>>>> yes, you are ;)
>>>> nah, I do not have any idea where to run them... I even doesn't know if I 
>>>> will, I was just thinking in loud.
>>>> but yes, I think it would be good if we can have recurrent (and reliable) 
>>>> benchmarks to show :)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> We ran a couple of benchmarks with the FulltextSearch project using the 
>>> rizel command line handler: 
>>> https://ci.inria.fr/rmod/job/FullTextSearch/plot/?
>>> 
>>> ./pharo $JOB_NAME.image rizel --packagesMatching='FullTextSearch*' 
>>> --reporter=RizelXMLReporter >> rizel.xml
>>> 
>>> so basically everything is there :)
>> 
>> yeah.. that what we actually wanted to do since a while.. when we
>> first started using CI..
>> Unfortunately for that we need a fully controllable environment: no
>> virtualization, sorry..
> 
> well you can perfectly use Rizel in a virtualized environment
> 
> 


Reply via email to