Humm, I would say this is overkill :P, there would be more Moose projects than 
Pharo ones.
So far we followed the strategy of having 1 fogbugz project per external 
project.

On 2013-05-31, at 13:52, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote:

> If I understand correctly, the tag is used to denote the component. In the
> case of Moose we have multiple of these sub-components and somehow they
> would need to be captured. Looking at the existing tracker, we have the
> categories as listed below.
> 
> Perhaps this would pollute too much the Pharo space?
> 
> Component-MooseCore
> Component-Famix
> Component-SmalltalkImporter
> Component-RPackage
> Component-Mondrian   = Visualization engine
> Component-Roassal    = Visualization engine
> Component-Glamour
> Component-Glamour-Seaside
> Component-Algos
> Component-Fame
> Component-Finder     = Issue relates to program UI
> Component-Install    = Utility and installation scripts
> Component-Docs       = Issue relates to end-user documentation
> Component-MooseTools
> Component-ExternalTools = External tools such as inFusion, srcML, VerveineJ
> Component-Test
> Component-CAnalyzer  = FAMIX extension dedicated to C
> Component-DSM
> Component-SmallDude
> Component-XML        = XMLParser and Pastell (XPath query facility)
> Component-Spy        = The Spy profiling framework
> Component-Hapao      = The Hapao test coverage tool
> Component-PetitParser
> Component-AutoMoose
> Component-Arki
> Component-VerveineJ
> Component-VerveineCSharp
> Component-EyeSee
> Component-Metanool
> Component-GlamorousToolkit
> 
> Cheers,
> Doru
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]
>> wrote:
> 
>> We could create a tag for moose without problem I guess.
>> I will let the experts answer.
>> 
>> Stef
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Would it be possible and desired, to open the Pharo fogbugz infrastructure
>> for other related projects?
>> 
>> Namely, I am thinking of Moose, in particular given that various issues
>> are directly relevant for Pharo as well? For projects like Moose, this
>> would imply less costs. The question is if something in this direction is
>> even desired.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>> 
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>> 
>> "Every thing has its own flow"
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> www.tudorgirba.com
> 
> "Every thing has its own flow"


Reply via email to