On Jun 6, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Goubier Thierry <[email protected]> wrote:
> Le 06/06/2013 08:32, Marcus Denker a écrit : >> >> On Jun 5, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Goubier Thierry <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Le 05/06/2013 16:04, Marcus Denker a écrit : >>>> >>>> On Jun 5, 2013, at 4:03 PM, Goubier Thierry <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Le 05/06/2013 15:56, Marcus Denker a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 5, 2013, at 2:39 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-2.0-Tests/./Run=run%201,VM=vm,label=linux/247/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 3 regressions found. >>>>>>> FileSystem.Tests.Disk.FileHandleTest.testTruncate >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Refactoring.Tests.Changes.RBRefactoringChangeTests.testPerformChangeComment >>>>>>> Tests.Monticello.MCClassDefinitionTest.testLoadAndUnload >>>>>>> >> >> Ok, so we have 2 independent issues; >> >> 1) testTruncate failing on recent Ubuntu in both 2.0 and 3.0 >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10852 >> >> 2) The slice I integrated was wrong / not complete: >> >> FileSystem.Tests.Disk.FileHandleTest.testTruncate >> Refactoring.Tests.Changes.RBRefactoringChangeTests.testPerformChangeComment >> >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10415 >> >> For this, I think the best would be to submit the missing code in some >> machine readable form >> as I right now am a bit confused about what exactly "adding the right flush >> methods" means. > > As far as I can browse, > SLICE-Issue-10411-flush-after-nextChunkPut-ThierryGoubier.1 contains the > correct code. > When I merge it in 2.0 606 I do not see any change.. > Do you want me to retry generating a slice? Maybe something is wrong with the image that was used to run the tests? Maybe that one actually was 605? Marcus
