On 25 Jun 2013, at 16:32, Damien Cassou <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hmm, you also need libssl0.9.8 or libssl0.9.8:i386 for Pharo since it >> includes SSL/TLS/HTTPS support out of the box. >> >> Anyway, missing deps are easily found using ldd. > > what is the problem with you guys? I spent and continue to spend days > on packaging Pharo for Ubuntu so that everyone can forget about > dependencies and 32 vs. 64 issues. So why do you keep on talking about > this complex and undocumented method of installing Pharo? Just execute > what is documented on the pharo.org website and you are guaranteed to > have the latest version of the VM working whatever your Ubuntu is > (provided it is still supported by Canonical) The recommended, first time experience should indeed be the ppa way - and it should be described as such everywhere. On the other hand, you can't stop Linux users from doing what they want. But then they should bear the consequences and not complain like little children ;-) I for one like the get.pharo.org way a lot as well, and at the same time I have used the ppa install to fix the dependencies on some machines. > -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without > losing enthusiasm." > Winston Churchill
