(Well, actually it was Camillo who opened and fixed while pair-programming this Monday)
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Martin Dias <[email protected]> wrote: > Done. I've resolved the one that was opened by me. > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We should do a pass over all issues. >> >> e.g. >> -> is your bug still relevant? >> -> if you submitted a fix, maybe the bug status is wrong and >> therefore nobody looked at it? >> -> if you added a verbal description of how to fix something, >> consider submitting code in addition >> (people have just no idea how much easier it is to deal with >> machine readable code than half-a-page of prose…) >> -> You where involved in a discussion about a bug. So now go trough >> it and summarize: What is the next *action* >> that needs to be done to close the issue? >> >> You can get a list of *all* open issues: >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/33/All-Opened >> >> or just the ones for 2.0: >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/8/2-0-Work-Needed >> >> and 3.0: >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/filters/37/3-0-Work-Needed >> >> >> For the 2.0/3.0 issues, we should decide: are they really of a kind that >> they need to fixed before we >> can release? (in 2.0: do we really need to back port? or is it enough to fix >> in 3.0?) >> >> Marcus
