On 2013-07-10, at 14:09, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe we should not throw away the distinction, I am used to it as well. > > But what Camillo means, I think, is that in the end it does not matter. > > For example, if I have a unit test for some object's #printString both the > case where is does no longer return what I expect and the case that it > suddenly throws an error mean the same thing: the object's #printString is > broken.
Exactly, in the end you can perfectly deduce the type of failing test by the thrown error, no?
