On 2013-07-12, at 10:52, Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 12.07.2013 um 10:45 schrieb Marcus Denker <[email protected]>: > >> >> On Jul 12, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Sebastian Tleye <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I am writing a blog of the changes i have been doing, this particular >>> change is not still there but it will be soon (today or on monday) :) >>> >>> >>> 2013/7/12 Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> >>> >>> Am 12.07.2013 um 07:22 schrieb Damien Cassou <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> 11151 More changes needed to trait/classes polymorphism >>>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11151/ >>>> >>>> >>>> That's huge. Soon, we will be able to remove thr ClassDescription and >>>> Behavior classes. It makes sense because they are useless in the >>>> presence of traits. But do people want it? >>>> >>> Uff, I don't know if I want it because I hear it the first time and it >>> sounds shocking at first. Can you elaborate on this or give some pointers >>> for documents? >>> >> >> I am sceptical, too. This should not be done just like that. >> >> We changed already so much in Pharo3… we need to be a bit conservative for a >> while. >> > You read my mind! Just counting the changes I remember from the last weeks I > have the feeling the whole thing might collapse the other day.
Nobody uses the internals of Trait, so this is no big deal. For migration, which only concerns extension methods on TPureBehavior (again people ignore Traits anyways), you simply move them TClass, problem solved.
