On Jul 29, 2013, at 6:23 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote:
> Marcus did you pay attention that linkedList code and scheduler should be > modified carefully (message send versus inlined) ? > I remember an old bug that was based on the modification of atomic property > due to not using message end (preemption). > Yes, we are removing possible points of interruption, not adding them. So it should be save. > Stef > > On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 30314 >> ----- >> >> 11263 isNil ifTrue: to ifNil: part 3 >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11263 >> >> 11264 isNil ifTrue: to ifNil: part 4 >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11264/ >> >> Diff information: >> http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Spec-Tools-MarcusDenker.120.diff >> http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Ring-Core-Kernel-MarcusDenker.128.diff >> http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Polymorph-Widgets-MarcusDenker.870.diff >> http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Gofer-Core-MarcusDenker.196.diff >> http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Collections-Strings-MarcusDenker.271.diff >> http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/AST-Core-MarcusDenker.180.diff >> >> > >
