2013/8/14 Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> > i wonder, if we can modify the compiler, so that when it sees that > method's selector has well known name, it categorizing method > automatically under right category :) > (dunno however, what to do about existing code, when you recompiling it) >
This is possible but I don't think it belongs to the compiler to do that. I would rather modify Behavior so when it adds a method with no protocol it categorize it efficiently according to its superclasses / subclasses selectors and protocols.. > > On 14 August 2013 04:32, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote: > > Stéphane Ducasse wrote > >> I started to be fed up about protocol inconsistencies > > > > Amen > > > > > > Stéphane Ducasse wrote > >> So I will propose a set of rules (and a tool - I'm working on it) to > >> automatically categorize methods. > >> ... > >> Now we discussed today with esteban for initialize* we will use > >> 'initialization' > > > > Yay! > > > > > > > > ----- > > Cheers, > > Sean > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Uniformizing-Pharo-tp4703357p4703577.html > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. > >
