On Aug 16, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Benjamin <[email protected]> wrote:
> We should have a look when I come back from holidays :) yes let us do a pass together. > > I designed that almost one year ago, so do not expect my tiny brain to > remember that :P > > Ben > > On Aug 10, 2013, at 10:03 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi esteban/ben >> >> I'm trying to understand the new class organisation. >> Now would it be possible to (beside the backward compatibility part) only >> use protocol instead of category? >> Because this is quite confusing to have categories that manipulate Protocol >> objects. >> >> I would like to add some queries >> hasProtocolFor: aSymbol >> >> And may be we should do a pass and add some comments to the methods because >> I could get what >> some do but by putting a break point. >> >> For example, >> >> realCategories >> ^ self protocolOrganizer protocolsNames >> >> So tell me what you think because may be I too tired now. >> >> Stef >
