Hi, I was at ESUG last week and I discussed about this issue with some people, and in the end Stef told me "drop a mail in the mailing list, I am interested to understand what all the other people think about it". So, here I am.
I have my project in which I am modeling development sessions. Each session object has a number of meta-data (e.g., start, end time, etc.) and a collection of events. Each event object owns some meta-data and some references to classes that were "touched" by a given event (i.e., now I am using the Ring definition of the classes, since I plan to serialize and deserialize them and I cannot serialize the real class object, it would be too heavy, isn't it?). Now the question: I would like to create a Moose model of a development session to be able to import the sessions in the Moose panel and play around with the excellent Moose tool-suite. How should I proceed? Do you think it's better to annotate and add pragmas to the existing classes or to create a minimal parallel hierarchy of my model (i.e., MooseSession for MySession) and have something like MySession>>#asMooseDef which returns an object of kind MooseSession? Thanks in advance, Roberto
