That cannot happen on smalltalkhub. duplicated version names are not accepted. There are 16 projects on source.squeak.org, that should have a low probability to happen again...
On 2013-10-03, at 19:46, Nicolas Cellier <[email protected]> wrote: > Beware, I got bitten recently on Squeak-trunk and I have overriden an > existing package by publishing twice with same name... > This is because the Squeak version does silently ignore if there was a > previous version in the package-cache. > And because source.squeak.org just accepts to override... > > > > 2013/10/3 Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> > >> yes. Also the name repetition is a) very improbably anyway and 2) nobody >> cares (or at lease, MC does not cares) >> >> the only problem that could happen is in the remote case where you could >> want to join repositories previously separated. >> We think we can live with that potential problem :) >> >> Esteban >> >> On Oct 3, 2013, at 6:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> We were fed up about that and we made sure that we can work off line >> (and not checking all the repositories on earth) in 3.0 with esteban >>> >>> On Oct 3, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, that is what Monticello does on a save: check for potential name >> conflicts in all linked repositories. It is just the way it is. It is not a >> 100% foolproof way to guarantee uniqueness, but it will help in certain >> cases. >>>> >>>> We once thought about making this check optional (and a setting). >>>> >>>> One way out might be to remove all but the package-cache from the >> repositories linked to your package, but I haven't tried. >>>> >>>> On 03 Oct 2013, at 15:58, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Monticello goes fetching a unique number in the previous version of a >> given package on Smallatkhub and that means requiring network access. >>>>> >>>>> Why is it so? >>>>> >>>>> I was working without network access and this bite me. >>>>> >>>>> I was able to get out of trouble with my Phone as an access point. >>>>> >>>>> But for some scenarios (w/ security and no external network access) >> this is really a pain. >>>>> >>>>> Also, the fact that I had to do a Cmd-. to get out of this is >> annyoying. >>>>> >>>>> Clues? >>>>> >>>>> Phil >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
