That cannot happen on smalltalkhub. duplicated version names are not accepted.
There are 16 projects on source.squeak.org, that should have a low probability 
to happen again...


On 2013-10-03, at 19:46, Nicolas Cellier <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Beware, I got bitten recently on Squeak-trunk and I have overriden an
> existing package by publishing twice with same name...
> This is because the Squeak version does silently ignore if there was a
> previous version in the package-cache.
> And because source.squeak.org just accepts to override...
> 
> 
> 
> 2013/10/3 Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>
> 
>> yes. Also the name repetition is a) very improbably anyway and 2) nobody
>> cares (or at lease, MC does not cares)
>> 
>> the only problem that could happen is in the remote case where you could
>> want to join repositories previously separated.
>> We think we can live with that potential problem :)
>> 
>> Esteban
>> 
>> On Oct 3, 2013, at 6:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> We were fed up about that and we made sure that we can work off line
>> (and not checking all the repositories on earth) in 3.0 with esteban
>>> 
>>> On Oct 3, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Yes, that is what Monticello does on a save: check for potential name
>> conflicts in all linked repositories. It is just the way it is. It is not a
>> 100% foolproof way to guarantee uniqueness, but it will help in certain
>> cases.
>>>> 
>>>> We once thought about making this check optional (and a setting).
>>>> 
>>>> One way out might be to remove all but the package-cache from the
>> repositories linked to your package, but I haven't tried.
>>>> 
>>>> On 03 Oct 2013, at 15:58, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Monticello goes fetching a unique number in the previous version of a
>> given package on Smallatkhub and that means requiring network access.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why is it so?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was working without network access and this bite me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was able to get out of trouble with my Phone as an access point.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But for some scenarios (w/ security and no external network access)
>> this is really a pain.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also, the fact that I had to do a Cmd-. to get out of this is
>> annyoying.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Clues?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Phil
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to