Camillo Bruni wrote:
seems like it works,

so by default the pharo-internal projects will have the Area "1. Pharo Image" set.

Why the "1."? Well I cannot order the Areas, and the first one is selected by default :P

The filter "review" and "integration" now only look at issues that have the proper Area set.
  

Looks good.  The "1." looks fine, but in case it is useful I happened to find a Fogbugz script "Set Hard Default for Project and Area in New Cases" at [1] that seems related.
I'm curious now whether 'External' projects are then free to use Milestone=Pharo3.0 if they want to target certain issues of their own to align with that release date? 

cheers -ben

[1] http://help.fogcreek.com/8534/bugmonkey-script-archive


On 2013-10-06, at 08:08, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote:

  
thanks!
This is a good idea.

On Oct 6, 2013, at 1:57 AM, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote:

    
I think it should just be fine if we define a different workflow (and thus different labels) for external projects...


          
The 'Area' field looks unused, having only a single option 'Misc'.  Perhaps that could be 'Image' and 'External Project' or similar.  Most of an external project's issues would also have an area of 'External 'Project', but sometimes it might be 'Image' if a change there is required to fix an issue reported on a project.    Or maybe for external projects you have only a single option 'External Project' for Area.  
        
So we need to have 2 things
1. a separate project for each external project that wants to report
2. a separate Area for these external projects

For instance, NativeBoost has both a stable version in the image and a development
version aside. So if a bug appears in the image we can set the Area to "Pharo Image" (the default).
However, if the bug concerns the development version we set the Area to something project
specific.

I will try to update the tracker and the filters to reflect that...
      
    
  

Reply via email to