On 15 oct. 2013, at 14:46, Camillo Bruni wrote:

> processing.org uses monospaced font, these are the art guys that have more 
> sense graphics
> than any one this mailinglist
> (BTW, how many of you have visited an art school?)

Me, many times.
And surprisingly, most people there will tell you that (today's) art is not 
concerned with aesthetics :)

> 
> Besides Smalltalk, I don't know any other language that would use proportial 
> fonts.
> 
> After that, anybody who really knows how to use Pharo can modify it.
> The newcomer is the only one you target...
> 
> On 2013-10-15, at 13:57, Goubier Thierry <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Interesting discussion. I'll raise a few issues.
>> 
>> Le 15/10/2013 13:29, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit :
>>> well... fonts and UX  in general are two different (yet related) issues.
>>> 
>>> UX is a huge an complicated task, and has to be taken very seriously if we 
>>> want to succeed. To allow the appropriate/productive/happy flows in an 
>>> environment requires a lot of effort and to put all the pieces together.
>>> Yes, I know, that sounds so general that is like not saying anything :)
>>> Here is the concrete: Put all the UX pieces together requires a lot of 
>>> effort usually not taken into account. That's how the UX evolved more or 
>>> less the same way as morphic: a patch over a patch without much thinking 
>>> about the issue, just takign what is there and parching/extending as 
>>> needed. As morphic, the current UX in pharo is broken: there is no 
>>> coherence between tools and sometimes even inside the same tool (for 
>>> example nautilus has different behavior inside the code panel than in the 
>>> list panels on top).
>>> This is not the fault of any tool, just a consequence of how evolution was 
>>> managed until now.
>> 
>> Some of the thing most forgot is that when you do a GUI, what takes time is 
>> not doing it, it's polishing it. Making sure all small things play together 
>> nicely, and that you've spent days trying to get that drag and drop to work 
>> in the perfect way, with the right feedback and all (and focus navigation, 
>> and...).
>> 
>>> So, we wanted a better UX for Pharo3 that included: a new Theme, new Icon 
>>> set, and new tools that worked well together. But task demonstrated to be a 
>>> hard to beat beast, and we just moved forward in small areas (there is for 
>>> example a new centralized menu coming along with a new spotlight).
>>> And there is a prototype of a new theme and also some icons that where 
>>> thought specially and that will fit nicely.  But they will not be ready 
>>> this year and after thinking a while (and getting feedback of people in 
>>> community), we decided, for Pharo3:
>>> 
>>> - adopt the glamour theme. This is a step forward our current one because 
>>> glamour guys (specially Doru) continued working on it to have a really 
>>> clean and simple theme.
>> 
>> Is it the default theme coming with the latest 3.0, with that flat look? 
>> Hate it because it breaks one HCI guideline visual cue: feedback when 
>> pressing on a GUI element (scrollbars, buttons); there is none in that theme.
>> 
>> There it looks like a step backward, coming back to the squeak look (which 
>> turned me away from squeak for many years: yes that's not rational but can't 
>> get over it. Pharo was the first to give me back the feedback at the GUI 
>> level)
>> 
>>> - adopt the EclipsePack theme because is an iconset specially thought for 
>>> programming that plays very well together. No matter if you do not like 
>>> Eclipse (even if I think you are missing the relevance of Eclipse and a lot 
>>> of good ideas that we could take from them), is about creating a unified 
>>> vision. The old icon set (famfam) was not intended for programming 
>>> environment and also there were a lot of different icons incorporated 
>>> anarchically.
>> 
>> Iconset are hard. But some of the Eclipse iconset are downright ugly 
>> (packages).
>> 
>>> - adopt a monospaced font for coding (right now Source Code Pro) and a 
>>> non-monospaced for the rest (right now Open Sans).
>> 
>> Hum. Once you're set on a non-monospaced font for coding, as most 
>> smalltalkers have, going back to a monospaced font will hurt... I'm not even 
>> using a monospaced  font for coding in C :(
>> 
>>> The objective is to offer a L&F that where visual elements plays well 
>>> together.
>> 
>> Work on that is the real key. Not sure the theme changes are part of it, 
>> however.
>> 
>> I value more a drive to get everything Spec-iffied: tends to create a lot of 
>> common look and feel because applications tend to behave in the same way.
>> 
>>> And there is another more important (IMHO) objective: to offer newcomers an 
>>> environment easier to approach. Pharo (and all Smalltalk-inspired 
>>> environments)  is already very alien for newcomers. We get a lot of power 
>>> in exchange of that alienish stuff, but very often the curve of learning or 
>>> acceptance is too high and people that could step closer to us are pushed 
>>> away. So, my idea is to keep been as alien as possible in the things that 
>>> make us Pharo and be the less alien possible in the rest: A nice L&F that 
>>> can be feel as "some kind" familiar, is part of it.
>> 
>> It's a good objective, but... There is something there; Pharo is different 
>> enough in it's approach that trying to match Eclipse won't work and may even 
>> disrupt more, because you will make it alike where it is not.
>> 
>>> Said so... well you still can switch back to the old and ugly (IMO) L&F 
>>> executing some lines of code in your workspace.
>> 
>> Or a setting somewhere :)
>> 
>>> Same to fonts: monospaced fonts is the worldwide accepted  way of present 
>>> source code. Why should we stay different?
>> 
>> I wouldn't be so sure of that.
>> 
>>> In any case, please give it a chance before drop it (once I can actually 
>>> see why the fonts are not really applied) and we'll see how it works.
>> 
>> I will :) But, I'd be frank, here none of us is a HCI specialist, and it 
>> shows. Sorry, but it does. No usability testing, no look into HCI 
>> guidelines, but, at the same time, probably the most advanced GUI toolkit 
>> available (Morphic), some of the best mind when it comes to architecturing 
>> GUI code (and code on average), and the most productive environment around.
>> 
>> If you want to make it familiar, look into Dolphin and VisualWorks and copy 
>> that :)
>> 
>> Thierry
>> -- 
>> Thierry Goubier
>> CEA list
>> Laboratoire des Fondations des Systèmes Temps Réel Embarqués
>> 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex
>> France
>> Phone/Fax: +33 (0) 1 69 08 32 92 / 83 95
>> 
> 


Reply via email to