On 22.10.13 00:08, Camillo Bruni wrote:
see my long explanation here https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?11876#87218
it looks unsuspicous until the moment you try understand such a failing
assertion.
This isn't moving Pharo foward. This doesn't make the system any more
flexible, adaptable, modular or malleable. This doesn't make the system
any easier to maintain. This doesn't make the system any smaller,
faster, scalable or secure. This doesn't make the system any easier to
maintain. This doesn't make life easier for anybody developing Pharo or
using Pharo. This doesn't improve Pharo in any way.
This only adds code who's sole purpose is to break people's existing code.
If you disagree with such a way of writing tests then the right solution
IMHO is to write a SLint rule.
Cheers
Philippe
