I’ll look at the doc… However if some of you is online in Skype we can have a chat…
Cheers and thanks for help, Roby On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:45 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Indeed, I think I agree with Max. You can also use the substitute feature and > replace the instVars you don't want with nil or something...See the doc link > Martin sent. > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Max Leske <maxle...@gmail.com> wrote: > In my opinion the #fuelAccept: for the meta description object should be > overridden and there the behaviour for problematic references should be > defined. > > Roberto, what references does your meta object hold on to? > > Max > > > On 28.10.2013, at 22:16, Martin Dias <tinchod...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:13 PM, roberto.mine...@usi.ch >> <roberto.mine...@usi.ch> wrote: >> The idea is that I have an object (a session) which has meta data (time, >> duration, author) and some other object inside. >> >> I want that Fuel serializes just that object and not pointes to other >> object, globals and what not. >> >> This causes me a lot of troubles, moreover it makes the fuel file bigger >> than the optimum… >> >> Still there is something that I don't understand in your problem. If you >> just prune the graph, what your objects represent (conceptually) can be >> lost. Did you pick one of your problematic "session objects" are explored it >> until find how the unwanted block closures are referenced? I mean, fuel >> doesn't invent the unwanted closures magically, you are saying to fuel to >> serialize the graph with the unwanted objects already there. >> >> >> Cheers, >> R >> >> >> On Oct 28, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Martin Dias <tinchod...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:47 PM, roberto.mine...@usi.ch >> > <roberto.mine...@usi.ch> wrote: >> > Thanks, >> > >> > On Oct 28, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Martin Dias <tinchod...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Currently there is no such option. >> > >> > Maybe it is something which is needed, what do you think? >> > >> > The idea is that, if you serialize: >> > >> > a -> b -> c >> > >> > fuel actually would encode: >> > >> > a -> b -> nil >> > >> > >> > that? >> > >> > >> >> >> > > > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
