On 08 Nov 2013, at 19:39, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 08 Nov 2013, at 19:16, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 08 Nov 2013, at 18:53, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> yes, you have re-validate for each new image version, since things might >>> have changed in between ;) >>> >>> Note the tags on the left side: Validated in 30547, Validated in 30555, >>> Validated in 30556, Validated in 30557, Validated in 30558, Validated in >>> 30559 >> >> I understand, but they should be integrated, right ? >> Instead of making noise in my mailbox ;-) >> > maybe this could be seen as a hint to have a look at the change and write a > short not “Yes, this is good”. > > Marcus But so many issues are integrated without a second vote of approval, so why is it needed here ?
