A bit more details would help. For example I certainly dont mind testing fixes and marking them as resolved. My problem is that I am not an experienced smalltalker so I cant be sure what the expected behavior is.
Is there a guideline, criteria , principles a fix should follow, or is it just a matter "if it works, its ok" ? Also I was curious what happens to a fix after its marked as resolved, how exactly the slice is integrated ? On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]>wrote: > So we now have an automatic system to check that a change does not break > tests and even passes Code Critique. > > Nevertheless, this does *not* mean that any change that passes is good. > (e.g. a change that just deletes all tests is fine for > the monkey). > > So we *need* people to look at proposed changes! > > Right now I feel that I decide far too many things. It would be very nice > to have the input of more people. > > Marcus >
