2013/11/23 Eliot Miranda <[email protected]> > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> imo, a better term to use for it would be 'private class' , because >> anonymous is a bit fuzzy. > > > I disagree. Anonymous classes is the term that has been used for over two > decades. It means, literally, a class that has no name because it is not in > Smalltalk (or in a top-level environment if the dialect has namespaces). > This is not at all fuzzy. Private class means something quite different, a > class that is private to some environment, e.g. a class nested within another > class as occurs in SmalltalkAgents or Newspeak.
+1 Anonymous = without name. There's not much to add to it. Regards,
