> Am 24.11.2013 um 21:31 schrieb Tudor Girba <[email protected]>: > > I am using Pharo 3.0 in production and it is highly reliable. > So it is not just reliable but highly reliable? What does it mean and what do you call "using in production"?
Norbert > Doru > > >> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:08 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> This makes think of the tick tock model of Intel improvements. >> >> http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/silicon-innovations/intel-tick-tock-model-general.html >> >> Looks like with 2.0 and 3.0 we are going to have two "tick"s in a row. That >> may be too much. >> >> I am afraid even trying out 3.0 when reading about all the moving parts that >> are changing in all corners. >> >> Phil >> >> >> >> --- >> Philippe Back >> Dramatic Performance Improvements >> Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027 >> Mail:[email protected] | Web: http://philippeback.eu >> Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback >> Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos >> >> High Octane SPRL >> rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium >> >> Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/ >> Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast - >> http://spamcast.libsyn.com >> Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value >> Added Reseller >> >> >> >> >>> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Stéphane Ducasse >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi guys >>> >>> It would be good not to clean without a clear vision. >>> For example we cannot register an old browser to browse code via the menu >>> of a window. >>> Now let us think two minutes to see if you can get my point: >>> >>> - I want to unload nautilus, rb, keymapping, athens, Ecompletion, >>> Gofer, NativeBoost, Zinc, ….. >>> and reload them via their configuration so that we can manage Pharo >>> with configurations. >>> >>> - Right now we LOST yes LOST the configurations of most of the part >>> of the systems (I just spendt several afternoon >>> on the one of RB in the past and now guess what) because >>> we do not have a process to use them and we are afraid to have 10 >>> packages and 10 classes more in the system. >>> I do not understand why we do not start to put the configuration >>> inside the image. To me this is totally stupid >>> not to do it. >>> >>> - Now without a browser this is nearly impossible to work. So we >>> will remove the old browser >>> but we should go slowly because else I will you do it with emacs >>> outside the image to see if you succeed. >>> >>> So it would be good to focus on real impacting changes. >>> >>> Stef > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow"
