it should we just integrated metacello2, it is not a change of ours, is Dale's... and Dale is very concerned with backward compatibility, so anything could be used. In fact, you can load metacello2 into pharo2... if you want to use a ConfigurationOf subclass.
Esteban On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:41 PM, p...@highoctane.be <p...@highoctane.be>wrote: > Not to be speaking of MetacelloToolBox supporting that. > > Does it? > > --- > Philippe Back > Dramatic Performance Improvements > Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027 > Mail:p...@highoctane.be | Web: http://philippeback.eu > Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback > Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos > > High Octane SPRL > rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium > > Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/ > Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast - > http://spamcast.libsyn.com > Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value > Added Reseller > > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Torsten Bergmann <asta...@gmx.de> wrote: > >> In Pharo 3.0 there is a new class "ConfigurationOf" >> which I can subclass for my configurations. >> >> But then my config is not loadable in Pharo 2.0. >> >> The problem is that when people migrate the configs >> often are adopted for Pharo30 and still work for Pharo20. >> >> So one can use this new shiny common superclass only for new >> Pharo 3.0 configs onwards or is there a backport planned ... >> >> Thx >> T. >> >> >> >> >> >> >
