kilon alios wrote > I dont see much room for thought, this looks to me like ideal behavior.
I agree in theory, but it seems that the tree is primarily about chunking information into manageable pieces. A primary difficulty here is that packages are often divided for reasons that have nothing to do with the domain model, e.g. the ubiquitous MyPackage-Platform, which is an artifact of Metacello that is not all that relevant to a user wanting to understand the system. >From the naive user perspective, if I'm exploring from the top level of the system, I want to see things like: - CodeImport - Collections - Compiler >From this perspective, the 14 entries for Collections, multiplied by a few dozen top-level categories make the list unwieldy and only marginally less daunting than the flattened list we used to have (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Magical_Number_Seven,_Plus_or_Minus_Two ): <http://forum.world.st/file/n4726287/Picture_1.png> ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Nautilus-Tree-tp4723819p4726287.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
