On 02 Dec 2013, at 16:24, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> wrote:
> Uko2 wrote >> Shouldn’t we develop our tools in a more friendly way? > > That would be fantastic. This thread is very interesting! > > And, I just want to remind everyone that Pharo 3.0 is unreleased... Do not > expect it to be stable, It’s not about stability of pharo 3, it about concurrency. And it’s the same problem in 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 2.0. I can write ruby code while running tests, but I cannot do that in Pharo. This thread doesn’t seem to have any reason, so I should just apologise for creating it because of frustration and ask everyone to stop discussing this :) > although it is remarkably so for the amount of deep > changes that have been made. Maybe that has lulled us into a false sense of > security/expectation. Remember, caveat emptor until it is released, when > there obviously shouldn't be any changes which might introduce this kind of > bug. > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Responsible-development-tp4726686p4726749.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
