> The main issue is that it is complicated to embed the VM in C code. > That's due to how the VM is done. > > Compared to TCL, where you can easily embed the interpreter in a C program, > this is a problem. http://wiki.tcl.tk/3474 > > Where you can embed the interpreter in a C program, you can do whatever > integration you want. > > Now, with NativeBoost, we can call C. The next challenge would be to be able > to call Pharo from C by embedding the interpreter. > > I am curious to see what you guys think about this.
It is one of my dream! Now I'm too bad in C to make this dream comes true. Sadly. But I would love to have Pharo being able to be embedded in C. > I would love to see things like mod_pharo (as there is mod_php, mod_perl, > mod_tcl...) in Apache. > > > > > > --- > Philippe Back > Dramatic Performance Improvements > Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027 > Mail:[email protected] | Web: http://philippeback.eu > Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback > Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos > > High Octane SPRL > rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium > > Pharo Consortium Member - http://consortium.pharo.org/ > Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast - > http://spamcast.libsyn.com > Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value Added > Reseller > > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:48 AM, kilon alios <[email protected]> wrote: > please note that generating dlls alone wont be enough , plugins are compiled > against a runtime or specific libraries (a Plugin SDK) and Smalltalk MT would > have to be able to do that in order to be a viable solution. > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> > wrote: > You should think that they use their smalltalk for their projects. > > Stef > > On Dec 9, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Clément Bera <[email protected]> wrote: > >> How can people even know Smalltalk MT still exist with their website and >> their communication ? >> >> I looked at other Smalltalks a while ago, for Smalltalk MT I clicked on >> "what's new" on their website and I got that: >> >> <Screen Shot 2013-12-09 at 9.18.11 AM.png> >> >> Then I thought this Smalltalk was dead (nothing new in the past 4 years) and >> I didn't look any further. >> >> >> 2013/12/8 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> >> >> > Yes - still alive and kicking. But I'm sure you did not notice since there >> > are no "big" announcements or advertising for it. >> > ObjectConnect follows the "time is better invested into technology" >> > strategy. >> > It is one of the most interesting Smalltalks ever implemented. >> >> http://www.objectconnect.com/stmt_overview.htm >> I like the idea that you can get 50kb applications. >> Now since this is a closed system and windows-centric. >> But I like that it shows that Smalltalk does not have to be the image >> centric way. >> >> > >> > The newest ST/MT 6.3 version (now 64 bit) is from end of November 2013 >> >> Now it is not a community thing. :) >> And the web site stop and 5.6 in 2009. >> >> Last time I talk to tarrick he told me that he could control the "no gc in >> the next 250 frames on PS2" >> but it was in 1998 :) >> >> >> Stef >> > > >
