Hi Sven, I agree with the underscore point of view, and I like the idea of graying it out. I added an issue for it: https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1035
Cheers, Doru On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 19 Dec 2013, at 22:26, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > > > That is a good observation :). > > > > You do not like the underscore, or the "sel" entry? > > > > If you talk about the underscore, I just wanted a way to distinguish > between special variables. You also see the same "notation" in the debugger > (variables like _self and _thisContext). > > > > If you talk about the entry altogether, this part is more experimental. > Some people did not like the printout in the comment, and then I added > _self to show the print string next to it. I am still not decided on > showing it. What do other think about it? > > > > Cheers, > > Doru > > I guess you need self for objects without instance variables. > > I don’t like the underscore, every Smalltalker should know about self, > super and thisContext. You could make them bold or italic or gray. > > > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Ah, yes, and I don’t like the _self. Why would you want to do that ?? > > > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
