Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
I thought wider community involvement was encouraged for anyone to provide the peer review to move items to status Resolved Fix To Includethat’s usually done by the integrators, but nothing prevents you to do it :) with the integrators then moving it to status Resolved Fix Included (and then usually straight to Closed status) cheers -ben. On 29 Dec 2013, at 21:47, Nicolai Hess <[email protected]> wrote: |
- [Pharo-dev] FogBugz status change Nicolai Hess
- Re: [Pharo-dev] FogBugz status change Esteban Lorenzano
- Re: [Pharo-dev] FogBugz status change btc
- Re: [Pharo-dev] FogBugz status change Marcus Denker
- Re: [Pharo-dev] FogBugz status change Benjamin
- Re: [Pharo-dev] FogBugz status cha... Marcus Denker
- Re: [Pharo-dev] FogBugz status cha... Stéphane Ducasse
- Re: [Pharo-dev] FogBugz status... Benjamin
- Re: [Pharo-dev] FogBugz st... Norbert Hartl
- Re: [Pharo-dev] FogBugz st... Stéphane Ducasse
- Re: [Pharo-dev] FogBugz st... Norbert Hartl
- Re: [Pharo-dev] FogBugz st... Esteban Lorenzano
- Re: [Pharo-dev] FogBugz st... Marcus Denker
