forward to list, so discussion is not lost (my fault, I bad replied in the 
first instance :) )
 

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Torsten Bergmann" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Aw: Re: Voyage backends
> Date: 16 Jan 2014 14:16:12 GMT+1
> To: "Esteban Lorenzano" <[email protected]>
> 
> Hi Esteban,
> 
> why I like it:
> 
> - it is similar to SQLite3 very small, just one DLL or shared lib
> - very portable across many platforms (DB is independent from byte order or 
> 32bit vs. 64 bit)
> - easy to use
> - there is already a wrapper now for Pharo :)
> 
> "UnQLite is a standard key/value store similar to BerkeleyDB, Tokyo Cabinet, 
> LevelDB, etc. but, with a rich feature set including support for transactions 
> (ACID), concurrent reader, etc. "
> 
> http://unqlite.org/arch.html
> http://www.methodsandtools.com/tools/unqlite.php
> 
> Thanks
> Torsten
> 
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2014 um 14:08 Uhr
>> Von: "Esteban Lorenzano" <[email protected]>
>> An: "Torsten Bergmann" <[email protected]>
>> Cc: "Pharo Development List" <[email protected]>
>> Betreff: Re: Voyage backends
>> 
>> Ho Torsten,
>> 
>> well… I planned Riak and maybe Tokyo and Omnibase (but when I find the time… 
>> not much this days). I never thought about UnQLite (and also I never hear 
>> about it before :P )
>> 
>> cheers, 
>> Esteban
>> 
>> 
>> On 16 Jan 2014, at 14:03, Torsten Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Esteban,
>>> 
>>> if I understood correctly Voyage is primarily an abstraction layer to 
>>> access 
>>> NoSQL databases. Currently MongoDB or the image can be used as a backend.
>>> 
>>> Are there any other backends available or planned (for instance to UnQLite 
>>> using
>>> PUnqlite [1]). 
>>> 
>>> As UnQLite is an embeddable database of really small size I guess it will 
>>> be 
>>> as sucessful for the NoSQL world as SQlite3 was for the relation DBMS world 
>>> and supporting it as one possible backend for Voyage might be a real plus.
>>> 
>>> At least I see that MongoDB is 102MB to install before one can use it and
>>> unqlite library [2] is only a few KB ;)
>>> So it is easier to package, deploy, ... - I havent checked the other 
>>> features 
>>> of Mongo vs. PunQlite so far.
>>> 
>>> Any comments about backends in general or UnQlite in particular?
>>> 
>>> Thx
>>> T.  
>>> 
>>> [1] 
>>> http://forum.world.st/ANN-PunQLite-a-new-NoSQL-wrapper-for-Pharo-td4732162.html
>>> [2] https://github.com/mumez/PunQLite/tree/master/binary
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to