On 17 Jan 2014, at 15:28, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 17 January 2014 15:24, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 17 Jan 2014, at 15:12, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 17 Jan 2014, at 15:06, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 17 Jan 2014, at 15:03, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> is just to compile a NB Stack VM… with should be fairly straightforward… > >> > >> So that means there _is_ a working VM, right ? > >> Where can we download it for testing ? > > > > no, there isn’t :) > > there are some (minor) changes to do to a StackVM and they are not done yet. > > > > AFAIK, is just change one or two methods and to add the NB Plugin. > > I think many people are quite eager for this. > > So how many request does it take ? Who do we have to ask ? > > In any case, here is my request: > > Please, please, Dark Lords of the VM, can we please have a Pharo VM for 3.0 > for the Raspberry Pi, please, please, please ... > > > forget about having NB on ARM. yes, you can easily make VM-side plugin > working, > but image-side code is not nearly ready to run on it, because there's no ARM > assembler, no ARM calling convention(s) implemented whatever :)
oh, crap… I confused the architecture (I should think before answer mails, he). Yes… there is a problem with that. What we need is to make NB not mandatory in Pharo3 (right now there are problems with that), and we will. Pavel had some work on that direction that we want to integrate soon :) Esteban > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko.
