I guess that once we will use git it will go away. Does anybody know if this is a correct assmption?
On 19 Jan 2014, at 10:10, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > Very very nice! I integrate issue 12679. > > Yes, Monticello meta data… we should check this issue: > > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/2711/Monticello-wastes-significant-amounts-of-memory > > (but in general it is not good to have meta data of a versioning system in > the image… it needs to be on disk, and the history on > disk needs to not by in thousands of zip files…). > > On 18 Jan 2014, at 20:38, Pavel Krivanek <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I finally successfully created a script that is able to unload everything >> *by Monticello* except kernel packages, network, Monticello, Gofer and >> related packages. I will setup a job when Jenkins will be healthy again. >> It uses several temporary patches that we need to solve properly: >> - make NativeBoost optional >> - make UserManager optional >> - small super-easy issue >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12679/change-package-of-ClassTrait-soleInstance >> >> The size of resultant image is about 6.6 MB, 4.9 MB without MC data and >> caches. BTW in the full image Monticello data have about 5MB. The image has >> no Undeclared nor obsolete classes and is really able to load something >> using Gofer. >> >> With some care we can make it usable base for the next remodularization >> effort. >> >> Cheers, >> -- Pavel >> >
