On 05 Feb 2014, at 15:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
> And there is an obsolete instance …
>
yes, the reason has to be that when class gets renamed that the packages are
renamed that something is not correctly done
with the subclass… or maybe it happens on load of the package that something is
not done correctly?
Will look into that later… I will fix the obsolete later today .
Marcus
