Hey Sven,

Thanks for fixing that. We're close to getting Yesplan working on Pharo3 now. 
However, yesterday I stumbled upon another problem. It seems that a 
percent-encoded '+' (i.e. %2B) get eaten by Zinc and converted into a space 
(ie. %20).
The following test fails in latest Zinc but works in a Zinc on Pharo 1.4: 

| input request |
        
                input := 'GET http://localhost/foo+%2B+bar HTTP/1.1', String 
crlf, 
                        String crlf.
                request := ZnRequest readFrom: input readStream.
                self assert: (request url pathSegments hasEqualElements: 
#('foo%20%2B%20bar')).


I'm tracing if I can find the actual source of the problem.

regards
Johan


On 13 Feb 2014, at 22:47, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Kris,
> 
> I fixed the problem that you reported. It was a regression caused when adding 
> support for parsing mailto: URLs which don't have a // in them. There is now 
> a new explicit test for parsing '/foo:bar' asZnUrl.
> 
> Thanks again for reporting this problem!
> 
> Sven
> 
> In #bleedingEdge:
> 
> ===
> Name: Zinc-Resource-Meta-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.31
> Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe
> Time: 13 February 2014, 10:41:58.821615 pm
> UUID: dee515f8-aff3-4930-8b90-da2b01e1ee33
> Ancestors: Zinc-Resource-Meta-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.30
> 
> Patch ZnUrl>>#parseFrom:defaultScheme: to parse schemes more carefully so 
> that a colon in a path does not mess things up - see also the regression test 
> ZnUrlTests>>#testNoSchemeColonInPath parsing /foo:bar (thanks Kris Gijbels)
> ===
> Name: Zinc-Resource-Meta-Tests-SvenVanCaekenberghe.19
> Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe
> Time: 13 February 2014, 10:42:42.63619 pm
> UUID: 264c99fe-52ef-4f4a-8a25-fc870f34cfb2
> Ancestors: Zinc-Resource-Meta-Tests-SvenVanCaekenberghe.18
> 
> Patch ZnUrl>>#parseFrom:defaultScheme: to parse schemes more carefully so 
> that a colon in a path does not mess things up - see also the regression test 
> ZnUrlTests>>#testNoSchemeColonInPath parsing /foo:bar (thanks Kris Gijbels)
> ===
> 


Reply via email to