If you’ve loaded Seaside-Pharo then those extensions would be in the 
Seaside-Pharo package, wouldn’t they?


On 16.02.2014, at 14:15, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:

> When using the latest Seaside on Pharo 3 (either loading 
> ConfigurationOfBootstrap or the Seaside image, 3.0 bleedingEdge, built on the 
> pharo-contribution CI server), I have two mysterious dirty packages without a 
> repository:
> 
> - Seaside-pharo-core
> - Seaside-pharo-core-backtracking
> 
> These only contain extensions. There are no such Seaside package as far as I 
> can see.
> 
> What puzzles me is how the code got in the image in the first place: I can 
> understand that these are possible wrong extension protocol names, but since 
> they must be loaded by an MC package, how did they get into that package in 
> the first place ?
> 
> Sven
> 
> --
> Sven Van Caekenberghe
> http://stfx.eu
> Smalltalk is the Red Pill
> 
> 


Reply via email to