Hey!
On 02/21/2014 06:50 PM, Ronie Salgado wrote:
Hi there!,
It is great to hear that it is being useful. Currently I am taking some
vacations, so I will probably be without Internet access for some days.
[SNIP]
I took that kind of approach because it gives more flexibility, but it
provides probably a reduced performance in comparison with placing the
callouts directly in the wrapped classes. Some people that saw this when
developing this did not like this approach.
Yeah, I can see what you mean - and I think that's just fine.
One bit tricky problem: there are classes generated starting with lower
case. That doesn't fly :)
Also, LF instead of CRs after signatures makes NB barf when parsing.
That was easily solved with a global tr '\n' '\r' of course, the class
naming is a bit harder - need to go to the source.
I can see if I can find that one :)
regards, Göran
PS. Tried wrapping Nanomsg.org today, got so far as to start running
test code - but then it fails creating a socket - not sure why, might
not be your fault at all actually :) When it works I will blog about it.
